Judge Goldstone is hopefully not too upset at being out of the limelight for a few days.
One would have hoped it would have given him some time to respond to a letter from Ricky Hollander from CAMERA. Hollander asks some very specific questions, including some related to assertions made by Goldstone during his recent appearance at Brandeis University.
The respectful but clear letter, which is reproduced here, is worth reading – in particular related to the supposed deliberate attack on a flour mill and mosque.
So how did the good Judge respond, remembering that he has complained that no one has disputed his claims, and instead have used personal attacks?
Dear Ms. Hollander,
I confirm receipt of your letter. I have no intention of responding to your open letter.
In the same type of double standard that typifies the report, Justice Goldstone refuses himself to answer questions or provide clarification about the substance of his mission’s findings, yet slams Israel for having refused to cooperate with or answer the questions of his investigating team.
The real question now is how long can Justice Goldstone continue to hide behind the deceptive argument that no one has addressed the substance or findings of the report?
I’d say it’s time to hear from Judge Judy – you can pick which one of Judge Judy’s comments are most appropriate!